On Wednesday, Rep. Brad Sherman (D-Calif.) introduced an article of impeachment in the House, seeking to remove President Donald Trump from office for obstruction of justice. Rep. Al Green (D-Texas) co-sponsored the article.
Sherman first raised the specter of impeachment in early June, basing his case on Trump’s apparent interference in an FBI investigation into his former national security advisor, Michael Flynn.
As Sherman sees it, Trump’s firing of FBI Director James Comey ― who says he was fired in retaliation for continuing to investigate Flynn ― constitutes obstruction of justice.
“Recent disclosures by Donald Trump Jr. indicate that Trump’s campaign was eager to receive assistance from Russia,” Sherman explained in a media release. “It now seems likely that the President had something to hide when he tried to curtail the investigation of National Security Advisor Michael Flynn and the wider Russian probe. I believe his conversations with, and subsequent firing of, FBI Director James Comey constitute Obstruction of Justice.”
Near 50% of Americans find this dunderhead acceptable leaving the other 50% to being called Liberals (Now a dirty word) and persecuted by the other 50% who are incapable of critical thinking. We are creeping ever closer to an Idiocracy run by morons and dunderheads. This needs to be stopped, the easiest way is to show Cheeto-face the door.
Of course my problem solving answers fall on deaf ears as we continue to re-arrange deck chairs on the Titanic.
LikeLike
Spence would be preferable?
LikeLike
No way 50% of Americans find Trump acceptable. His fans are a minority.
Yes, creeping closer to “Idiocracy.” I need to watch that movie again.
I suppose you heard Kid Rock is thinking of running for Debbie Stabenow’s seat in 2018. I want to laugh, but he might be able to do it if Trump is a sign of a….a trend. 😦
LikeLike
Further investigation of Fallon on City Data revealed a ratio of 75 to 1 trump voters to Ole Hill. That means it is just as stupid there as it is here meaning no progress, scratch Fallon.
Next!
LikeLike
Is Auburn that bad?
LikeLike
It is getting very costly to live here, crummy houses start at 300K, rooms in peoples homes rent for 750, the lot rent here has gone up from 600 to 700 a month in a year and I own the home.
Not cost-effective to remain, looking for some peace and quiet somewhere less expensive and with fewer trump voters, (in search of intelligent life), this place isn’t it.
LikeLike
A giant chunk of ice broke off Antarctica. Is there anyone in America intelligent enough to gather Icebergs for their fresh water or just too stupid to collect the freshwater or just leave it melt into the ocean while our freshwater supplies dwindle.
LikeLike
That is a looong way away.
LikeLike
I guess no one cares about Marcy Wheeler. I’ll explain it for those of you unwilling or unable to look it up.
During the interview shortly after the time I posted yesterday, her eyes turned whitish with gray pupils very briefly, you have to watch closely to see it, followed by a audible grunt.
I cannot explain what happened except she has a vast wealth of information in her mind that most folks do not. There is a possibility she is not what she appears to be on the outside and showed another side that was quite strange. It freaked me out.
Believe it or not.
LikeLike
I just googled her, she’s a journalist. Don’t understand the rest of what you wrote, where did you see her eyes turn whitish? Your next paragraph, you think that person is an alien, or something?
LikeLike
Den lives in a slightly alternative universe.
LikeLike
I resemble that remark!
LikeLike
Go to Democracy Now and watch (7/12/17) yesterdays’ show, scroll up to 34:50 minutes and play, let it play from there, watch her (Marcie) eyes! it happens quick, watch close, move back and watch again.
LikeLike
Trick of the lighting.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Nice try, nothing else changed in the lighting, nada.
LikeLike
Nothing in the lighting that you could tell from the video.
My second son is a cinematographer. He knows all the tricks that fool the eye.
LikeLike
Yesterday all that was sitting there was The Daily Show, which I watch every day on my TV. I think I’ll skip going back and take your word for what you described.
LikeLike
Don’t believe this:
LikeLike
To the Old Post Office took 26 minutes this sunny afternoon.
LikeLike
Watching the next table of 15 cogers, my age, struck once again by the fact that women mostly talk to women and men to men.
Maybe 16.
LikeLike
Guy stuff is different from gal stuff resulting in different topics of conversation.
LikeLike
Geezers, future Soylent Green or flower fertilizer….
LikeLike
I’ve always found women more interesting to talk to. Maybe, as you said, our topics.
Telling each other stories is interesting because unlike men, women bring a lot of detail to a topic. Bob was always amazed at times around the kitchen table with my friend Diane, how we took so long to get to the point of a story. We couldn’t just tell each other that there was a fight in a bar. We would start off with what bar, why we were there, who we went with, what we decided to wear, blah, blah, blah…..THEN we get to the fight the point, the fight.
After that there would be a rehash of the story with the listener asking questions to fill out the other’s story. It always took many beers to get through an evening of that, lol.
LikeLike
The return required 29 minutes for a daily total of 55 minutes, typical. A tidings of magpies, mostly perched on power lines.
I hafta include the one way time because this mobile device may require resetting, or,as happened today, it may reset itself. Whatever, the stopwatch feature resets to 0 with no backup.
Day 5: 265+55=320 minutes.
LikeLike
Man against machine.
LikeLike
I see a World where Icebergs are harvested for their freshwater. It would be foolish not to, and store it for our ever-drying planet.
LikeLike
Like THIS
LikeLike
Looks to be quite expensive, for the upscale market.
LikeLike
Oh what fun we had before TeeVee ruined it all….
LikeLike
Hitler Jugend.
LikeLike
Hey, Dr B...no, I do not know Don Easterbrook, but i know OF him…his global cooling position got lots of attention around here, in part, I suppose, because of his tenure in WWU’s geology department. Does one every have “professor emeritus ” yanked?
LikeLike
No, emeritus status is permanent.
What’s this about “Global cooling”? Would be desirable but the opposite is, of course, happening.
LikeLike
Prof Easterbrook, unless he’s changed his mind, claimed there is NO global warming, espouses global cooling. Lotsa folks thought he was rather looney.
LikeLike
Too many geologists fail to understand their own subject. Just look at the record for the Cenozoic.
We have added enough carbon dioxide to return to the mid-Pliocene or earlier. It will take some time to come to equilibrium with the current level of carbon dioxide.
LikeLike
See the Wikipedia page on Pliocene climate.
LikeLike